Anonos | ENISA Guidelines

GDPR Pseudonymisation: State-of-the-Art Technical & Organisational Controls to Achieve Functional Separation

Click below to download a spreadsheet to compare the capabilities of different vendors to comply with ENISA published guidelines on GDPR compliant Pseudonymisation.

View Vendor Comparison Matrix

Pseudonymisation. When you need more than consent for lawful data processing

This document provides a comparison of Anonos Pseudonymisation technology to ENISA published Guidance on Pseudonymisation.

Anonos state-of-the-art Pseudonymisation technology accomplishes Functional Separation to enable lawful repurposing of data while preserving 100% accuracy to maximise data utility by expanding opportunities to ethically process, share and combine data in compliance with evolving data privacy regulations.

read our report

The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) has published two reports since the adoption of the new GDPR Article 4(5) definition of Pseudonymisation on best practices for compliant Pseudonymisation - in November 2018 and 2019.

ENISA’s mandate is to enhance existing expertise in member states by supporting the development of cross-border communities committed to improving network and information security throughout the EU.

* Pseudonymisation techniques and best practices (Nov 2019) * Recommendations on shaping technology according to GDPR provisions (Nov 2018)

REFERENCES TO ENISA DO NOT INDICATE ANY RELATIONSHIP, SPONSORSHIP, OR ENDORSEMENT BY ENISA. ALL REFERENCES TO ENISA ARE INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE NOMINATIVE FAIR USE UNDER APPLICABLE TRADEMARK LAWS.